Friday, August 29, 2025

Ideas as Tools

(Athens, June 28, 2011: 48 hour strike)



Ideas as Tools

 

essay written by ben bussewitz

 

Philosophy is a great tool in which we systematize structures of understandings and beliefs to provide a basis for our overall ways of looking at the world, particularly the window with which we see fundamental and central aspects of life.

In this regard, could we not say that our philosophies are edifices of ideas, or thought, by which we sift through our perception, conceptualization, and interconnection with people, places, and things?

Why, alas, I think it could be done.

Therefore, we see, our vantage point of all our reality is processed through our ideas about philosophy.  Philosophy, in its ancient roots unto our present times is used to give us a basis for looking at and understanding the central, most important questions we have about life: What is life's meaning?  Where do we come from?  Is there an afterlife?  Does God exist?  What defines our actions or thoughts good ones?  For that matter, what is the basis of ethical decision-making?  What does it mean to achieve happiness?  What is the meaning of love?  What is the meaning of our transactions with various individuals besides ourselves, alternative earthlings?  What does it mean to merit a successful life?  What are the qualities and aspects of life that retain importance despite our aging and into elderly adulthood, like an old wine that is crisp and vintage?

I see I have all these answers in a way that makes sense inside my head and fits comfortably and stylishly for myself, and I hope you do too.  Either way, though, I entreat you to read on, as I discuss the meaning of ideas as tools.

To set aside philosophy for a minute, we see that architecture is considered one of the fine arts.  When someone consults books and professors studying to construct beautiful and durable buildings, the person familiarizes himself with the ideas of architecture that provide a basis for her or him to build.  The basic and complex ideas consisting the discipline of architecture allow the person to be knowledgeable and learned in the process of making buildings, bridges, dams, houses, tree-houses, dog-houses, government compounds, what have you, in the architects kit.  These canonical ideas are utilized, then, as the tools, that enable the architect to be a good creator of structures that withstand wear and tear.  And once they learn these studied ideas, the person who creates structures can use his own wit and creative functions to bring about creations that are classically hers or his.

Indeed, God created man in his image; this is a central piece of Christian wisdom.  There are different ways to interpret this idea that is based on Scripture, and one of those ways of understanding, is that God, who is the Creator, made man and woman to be able to create.  As God creates everything from the universe to the beautiful sunrise, so does man create a poem to interpretations of Socrates the Gadfly to windows from where to wait for the day to take off and take shape to houses to his personality to his meaning to his fate.  Humankind creates shoes and horseshoes and leather boots and goloshes.  Humankind creates music and painting and sculpture and novellas.,

It is the kind wisdom bequeathed to the aspirers of the skill of painting artwork from the masters that it is important to study the technique involved and the history of artwork prior to aiming to achieve a good or great artwork oneself.  Indeed, without this basic knowledge of the ways the professional and master painters utilize their brushes, good artwork is verily not possible.  The techniques of painting and the history of artwork are both matters that are composed of: ideas.  And then with virtue, attentiveness, practice, and hard-work, one is able to be herself a painter of a good artwork.  Thus, the individual will have the ideas that enable to bring about into the creation a great painting herself.  Therefore, the ideas paramount to painting (along with the practice and all the good work the artist does) are the available means to put to work the creative gene, i.e. provide the tools that make the painting come alive with vivaciousness, beauty, aura, and life.

With these two examples that are a couple of the classical examples of the fine arts, we see that ideas can be understood as central to the tools toward accomplishing an endeavor, even great feats.  It applies to poetry, sculpture, and plays as well.  We study the ideas (the rudiments, the history, the craft, the application— the art and the technique) and with our toolkit we bring our good and great works to life.

..

Doesn't the idea of "ideas" seem especially important and paramount to philosophy?

Well, why not?

..

..

The way in which ideas are thought about and brought forth is in the mind and also in the mind’s central apparatus within the person and within the person’s place in the world.  The person sees something that is engaged upon, important to his thought apparatus, and adjust accordingly in his mental faculties.  He sees the way it is going, he sees the way it is, he says the way he understands we are.  He is presented with circumstance, in a window of his understanding of his scenario and scenarios, and he is facing, either presently or vaguely, his ultimate fates.  These are important.  And they are thought in a way that is unique and essential to the person, in the lens of his philosophies.

This is then, important to study philosophy, for all people.  Although it is not essentially necessary to find a meaning in that which is meant, it is better to do it in a way, usually, that is derivative of the best philosophers ways of looking, ways at constructing, ways of conceptualizing, ways of  compartmentalizing, and ways of understanding meaning.

The noble and beautiful channel of the river of faith, that by which we have streamed upon our justification, the compartment of being that makes us centrally happy and peaceful and useful and paramountly understood is in our beautiful happiness that is that we have come upon the joy that Jesus lives in us, with us, and has taken our sin away through his beautiful feat of our understanding in the eyes of his fate, and then upon which he resurrects from the grave, lives again, and he has ascended into heaven.  We rest in peace that on the Last Day, we will be entered, embarked upon a blissful time in an endless place, in the perfect unity of God, we are justified.  We have the peace of grace.  This happiness, this joy, this undying and eternal window of gratitude for that we shall live eternally, in peace and grace and beautiful happy, is that what we are most founded upon, our home-abode edifice that is built on the solid ground of the blood of Jesus.  He has suffered greatly, that we shall live, and for him, for his love of us, we are eternally and gratefully thankful in halleluiahs of endless praise.  ..  Upon this understanding, this window by which we see our time on earth and the thereafter, this way of happiness in our being, as we enjoy the streets, the fountains of glory, the happy river, the fragrant pasture, the joy of earth, this is the foundation of our worldview, which is the outgrowth of our philosophies, the mode in of which we find grace in ourselves and happiness and our world.

The key zealous life of joy, the unfelt inside of a empty stocking on Christmas Eve,  the tidings of preening the farm, that which we upkeep: this is the time that we have.  This is the time that we are thankful.  This is the time that we sing.

And we are happy endlessly.

Ideas, these show us the way.  We never walk the way we intend without one.  We never walk a way we intend without one.  The way we walk is decided by our fate and our connection to it.  And our mind helps us navigate and direct.

We see, then, tools, help us understand.

We see, then, tools, the tools of philosophy, help us make sense.

And we clearly ascertain in our perception that philosophy is a vehicle to make sense of the best parts of life, the parts and the whole.

- B.J.B.

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

Rationalism and Empiricism: Two Main Schools of Epistemology


"Experience and Reason: Epistemological Vantage Points"

written by ben bussewitz

The earth contains the means to come to have knowledge of beautiful ideas.  Everything is an idea.  For instance, the word "cat" is a concept that conjures up an idea, namely a pussy cat who licks your hand and wants you to pet her, some of the time, anyway.  Cats also enjoy time spent alone, in their peaceful home.  Well, how did we domesticate them so well?

The earth contains lots of ideas.  Here is an experiment for you to try out in thought.  Think of lots of words and the concepts they conjure up, each word.  Check a dictionary, in case you need a reference.

The earth has lots of ideas and in any good idea there is "knowledge."  Hence, epistemology is the field of philosophy which is rightly understood as "the study of knowledge."

If you do not know how to apply epistemology to ascertain and store true knowledge, good knowledge in your mind, have no fear, alas, epistemology is here, one of the services provided in epistemology, "the theory of knowledge," is by looking into this philosophical school, one is able to find more ways to obtain truths, or "true knowledge." Knowledge, according to the predominate understanding of epistemology in the cannon, is able to be equated to "true, justified beliefs."  In this sense, we can see that we have a true idea that is justified, a true justified belief of what one of these are, when we conjure up the word, that is a concept and an idea, "car."  We picture them.  We do not have true justified belief that cars are like tanks that miniature army men use while kids play with them, well employed.  But we can recall, rather, in the earth we have been astounded by, and remember the way in which cars presented to our person, the way we saw them or understood the way in which they drove the street in nonchalance and peace to bring the driver and the passengers to the place those persons wish to be!  So now, thinking of the concept "car" shows us that we know what cars are, what that word means, what that idea means, and as such, "we have the knowledge of what cars are," or, in other words, "we have true justified belief of the meaning of cars."

Where does rationalism and empiricism fall into all this.  The truest way to understand these two competing schools of epistemology, "epistemology" being a branch of "philosophy," "the branch of philosophy that studies knowledge," is to see the way in which within this school of philosophy, epistemology, these are historically important two beautiful ways to look at epistemology, and that we can utilize in "the system we construct to understand and ascertain knowledge," our epistemologies, one could add.  Empiricism states, on the one hand, "all knowledge is derivative of experience."  Rationalism, on the other, argues that "all knowledge comes from reason."

We see here, to extend our understanding of these two schools of "the study of knowledge," we can see by formulating the understanding differently, in a way that is more elucidating: empiricism relies on the senses as the basis of knowledge claims (ears, eyes, nose, mouth, feeling) and rationalism depends on thought based in rationality, or good reason.

So, which do you choose: rationalism, or empiricism?

This was a hotly debated topic during the Enlightenment, which of these epistemologies people ought to choose, with debates from left and right field.

Why not be both a rationalist and an empiricist?

I say, we shall come to knowledge from reason and our senses, both, rather than saying one is not a worthwhile means by which to attain "truths" or pieces of knowledge, or knowledge claims, or propositional truths, or knowledge propositions (these are five synonymous modes by which to refer to "a truth that one knows.")

Alas, I am an empiricist and a rationalist.  I see that knowledge comes from the fountain of experience and the fountain of reason, both.

John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rosseau, David Hume, and Aristotle were each empiricists, in that they looked at experience as the fountain of all knowledge.

Rene Descartes and Plato were rationalists, in that they looked at the fountain of all knowledge to be reason.

Why ponder the either or about where we place the derivative fountain of our truths, our knowledge propositions.  We can say all is game, empiricism, rationalism, or whatever else helps us come to "knowledge claims," or truths.

..


the rest is still being written, and is presented thus far:

The way in which it is understood all well, the ways of the philosophical schools of the Enlightenment Period, is, primarily, there were two competing schools: the epistemic school of rationalism and the epistemic school of empiricism.  These were, as the idea suggests, divided by those who determined that as people they were able to obtain knowledge by means of experience, and those who determined that as people they were able to obtain knowledge by means of the faculty of reason.

I have shown a more advanced picture.  (I have shown that both of these fields is accessible, one may obtain knowledge by means of his faculty of reason and also one may obtain knowledge by means of his experiences.)

Before not too long, I will exhibit 

[fin]


thank you for checking out this outstanding understanding of philosophy, of which I have provided for you.  here, now you can also check this out, my free domain: https://thelightningage.wixsite.com/benbussewitz

- ben bussewitz